Omar Shahine recently posted an inspiring ode to laziness:
An email every few minutes and desktop alert + sound to go with it makes it to easy to lose focus on my task at hand and look at my inbox. While I loved this feature when Outlook came out, it's become the achilles heel of my productivity.
If you like getting work done, you learn to appreciate inspired laziness as the positive character trait it really is. And I take this one step further: I turn off notifications for instant messaging, too.
There's more on this in Ole Eichhorn's Tyranny of Email and Tyranny Revisited:
Whenever you are not doing something which requires concentration, by all means, run your email client, run your IM client, have notifications turned on, take 'phone calls, the works. But when you really need to get work done, turn everything off. Isolate yourself.
There are a few ways that laziness can be harnessed to work for you, if you let it:
Now, there's a pretty clear distinction between inspired laziness, as described above-- laziness that makes everyone's life a little easier-- and just plain not getting off your butt. If I was running a software company, I'd endeavor to hire the laziest people I could afford.
re: #1. Deadlines often have the effect of "helping" identify key goals. Samuel Johnson: "Depend upon it, sir, when a man knows he is to be hanged in a fortnight, it concentrates his mind wonderfully."
And as for why someone would have IM on at work, I'm baffled. As if the ordinary interruptions weren't enough.
mike on March 12, 2005 9:02 AMW/R/T IM at work, I was skeptical too. But it is nice for little one-off questions people have during the day. Within reason. I definitely prefer IM to phone calls or emails for small, straightforward questions that don't require a lot of back-and-forth brainstorming.
As with email, the trick is knowing when to stop using it and escalate to another, more appropriate communication method.
Jeff Atwood on March 13, 2005 1:37 AMThis is precisely why we need a enterprise version of twitter. Something that has the immediacy of IM, but also not the same level of intrusion.
As with any technology, it will take a few years before it gets adopted within large companies.
Shiva on November 28, 2008 2:36 AM@shiva: Laconica!
AndresVia on December 23, 2008 10:24 AMdick in ur butt
apple-juice on February 12, 2009 12:53 PMThis is precisely why we need a enterprise version of twitter. Something that has the immediacy of IM, but also not the same level of intrusion.
http://healthbig.ru
The comments to this entry are closed.
|
|
Traffic Stats |