Does anyone remember the Task List from early versions of Windows?
From those humble beginnings comes my all time favorite windows applet, the venerable Task Manager. Task Manager was introduced with Windows NT 4.0, and although it has changed little in the intervening nine years, it hasn't needed to. Unlike virtually every other Windows OS applet of similar vintage** I still use it every day. That's a testament to how well Task Manager was originally designed.
There are a few different ways to launch Task Manager:
Shift + Ctrl + Esc
Ctrl + Alt + Del, then click
or press the T key.
+ R, taskman, Enter
Task Manager has a tabbed interface, and there are a few rules applicable to all tabs:
The Applications tab isn't a complete list of everything running on your computer, just a list of everything that has a visible main window.
The Processes tab is a list of everything running on your PC, whether it has a visible window or not. I use this tab all the time to scan for processes using a lot of CPU or memory.
The Performance tab is the ultimate "dashboard" tab. If you know what to look for, this tab can tell you everything you need to know about the health of your PC.
CPU usage is the one graph that doesn't need a lot of explanation. It will show one graph per CPU, so it's a good way of verifying that your multiple CPU system is load sharing appropriately. You can also add a red kernel time line to the CPU graphs via the View, Kernel Time menu. That's a measure of how much time the CPU is spending servicing low-level driver requests (eg, busywork) instead of running code.
Apps tend to request a lot of memory-- more than they use at any given time. The OS will trim the less frequently used memory by writing it to disk in the page file. Page file usage is typically not a concern except in extraordinary cases; it's the commit charge you have to worry about.
A count of all the resources in use on your PC: processes, threads, and handles. Not terribly helpful; it's better to drill down on this data via the processes tab.
System Cache tells you how much memory is being used as a disk cache, eg, to avoid accessing the physical hard drive. There's a delicate balance between System Cache and Available Physical Memory. You want a reasonable amount of free memory, but free memory is also wasted memory-- it should be utilized as disk cache whenever possible.
Commit charge is the single most important section of the performance tab. It's the total amount of memory in use by all applications, including memory that has been temporarily paged to disk. If the peak commit charge is greater than the physical memory in your PC, your PC is running out of memory and thrashing. If it happens rarely, you're OK, but if it's a frequent occurence, it's time to get a memory upgrade. And god forbid you ever reach the commit charge limit. I guess then it's time to upgrade to a 64-bit OS.
Every application has a certain amount of OS housekeeping overhead. Most of it can be paged to disk if necessary, but some has to be in memory at all time. These numbers are basically trivia since they're so small relative to the 512mb or 1gb of memory in a modern PC.
The Networking tab is the newest addition to Task Manager, but it's also the most disappointing.
Divide by 1024 and we've got kilobytes per second throughput for that network card.
Yeah, there are better task management applications, but you have to admit-- for a nine year old bundled application, ye olde Task Manager is pretty kickass. I took a quick look at Task Manager in the latest pre-beta 2 build of Windows Vista from PDC 2005, and I didn't see any obvious differences. Here's to another 9 years of glorious Task Management!
* the "Shut Down" menu is not shown on the Task Manager window when accessing machines over Remote Desktop. However, you can shut down machines remotely using Ctrl+Alt+End to bring up the Windows Security dialog which has a Shut Down button.
** Charmap or WordPad, anyone? I didn't think so.
Task Manager is great but I actually use Charmap more frequently, for special symbols (quotation marks) and foreign characters.
Chris Nahr on September 22, 2005 4:30 AM(Extended)?
Ah: a href="http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000050.html"http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000050.html/a
James Kew on September 22, 2005 4:46 AMYou're wrong on VM Size. It's the total of all private (not shared) bytes allocated by this process, whether currently in physical memory or not. It's a better value for tracking whether you have a memory leak than 'Mem Usage'. The same value is available in Performance Monitor as 'Process: Private Bytes'.
Mike Dimmick on September 22, 2005 4:49 AMLooks like I need a memory upgrade :-/.
Total available: 1047548
Peak: 1119484
I use charmap a lot. Mainly due to the woeful inconsistency of the keyboard acrobatics required to add accents to characters. It seems to vary by configured input locale, application, machine, and phase of moon.
But I use task manager more. Not least because I always add a shortcut for it to my Startup programs on any Windows machine I use.
Ian Griffiths on September 22, 2005 6:09 AMI use charmap a lot.
Who knew there were so many charmap lovers? I appreciate the need for a unicode browser, but charmap is such an incredibly crappy applet though.
I usually use the Word "Insert Symbol" dialog. Unlike charmap, it's a sizable window (shock), and the default font is large enough to actually SEE the characters on a 1600x1200 panel..
Jeff Atwood on September 22, 2005 6:27 AM(Extended)?
Not only that, but this too:
http://www.codeproject.com/system/Task_Manager_Extension.asp
Jeff Atwood on September 22, 2005 6:40 AMSomething related but still a little off topic. If you do hit Ctrl+Alt+Delete and holt down Ctrl and press "Shutdown" to do an emergency shutdown.
It's not very graceful, but it is fast
PS: I'm voting for Charmap as well.
Andrew Dugdell on September 22, 2005 8:30 AMLearnt a few things about taskman there Jeff, thanks. I too place a shortcut to it in the startup of each machine I use for an extended period of time.
And, yep, charmap blows chunks. Thanks for the tip about words insert symbol. Lets see if I can remember that one :)
Daniel F on September 22, 2005 10:33 AMIn my experience, simply loading taskman spikes the CPU usage, it that correct? It always looks alarming for a split second there.
The processes tab + Google can tell you, in a rough way, whether everything running is something you actually want running. Of course, if a malicious program has hijacked a system process, that doesn't help much. Still.
mike on September 22, 2005 11:03 AM**Stupid Taskman trick**
Scenario: Explorer.exe crashed, you can't see your taskbar or your desktop icons. No start menu, no systray, etc.
Solution: Run taskman! The keyboard-based options are what you'll need here, ctrl-shift-esc is my favorite. Winkey+r;taskmgr isn't an option because it's tied to explorer.exe
-Ctrl-shift-esc
-File-New Task
-explorer
and that restarts the explorer process for you.
There may be a simpler way to do this that doesn't involve logging out but I can't think of one at the moment.
Daniel Pritchett on September 22, 2005 11:15 AMOh, and for bonus points test my above tip by using taskman to kill the explorer.exe process first :)
Daniel Pritchett on September 22, 2005 11:16 AMThat's what I get for posting before I had my coffee, Jeff posted the same tip I did in his original article :(
Daniel Pritchett on September 22, 2005 12:36 PMFor those who like charmap, but are frustrated by its limitations, a great (and free) replacement for charmap is Babelmap (a href="http://www.babelstone.co.uk/Software/BabelMap.html)."http://www.babelstone.co.uk/Software/BabelMap.html)./a
Bradley Grainger on October 3, 2005 1:58 PMI was wondering if anyone of you guys could explain to me why my Network Utilization never goes past 5 percent. Cause I've never seen it go past that. Thanks
Shaun D on October 14, 2005 8:41 AMHi, Can anyone help? Please!!!
When i try to access Task Manager, a dialogue box pops up telling me "Task Manager has been disabled by your administrator" :(
But i am the administrator! Its my computer!
Can anyone tell me how to get Task Manager to work again?
Thanks.
Shaun D: I assume you have a 10/100t network card on your computer. You will very rarely use all that bandwidth, especially for an internet connection (which is a small fraction of the possible network bandwidth).
Richard: See if access has been revoked under the Local Security Policy under the Administrative Tools.
BB on October 27, 2005 4:09 AMHi. When i look at task manager on my SQL server i am getting a total commit and peak commit of about 1.4G after the machine has been on form about 4 hours. However when i count up the memory useage on the processes tab i am only getting about 400M. how can i see what is using the additional memory as regular reboots are needed at the moment to stop the server crashing
Paul on November 14, 2005 3:52 AMthe performance graphs would be way more useful if they had time labels on the x axis so you could correlate spikes in the graphs with the times of other events on the machine. is there some way to display time labels like this?
rich on December 24, 2005 8:25 AMHi, Can anyone help? Please!!!
When i try to access Task Manager, a dialogue box pops up telling me "Task Manager has been disabled by your administrator" :(
But i am the administrator! Its my computer!
Can anyone tell me how to get Task Manager to work again?
Thanks.
Sander,
I am battling with that "Task Manager has been disabled..." problem as well. I'm pretty sure it was a virus/worm/whatever that does this. I have gone into "control panel/user accounts" and created a new account with administrator abilities, but I haven't found a fix yet to give the existing account admin abilities. Also, the virus/worm/whatever is likely to ultimately change the account setting of the new account unless you run virus protection/etc to kill it.
Good luck,
Roger
Sander,
I found the fix for "Task Manager has been disabled...". It's a little more complicated because I have Windows XP Home Edition, and GPEDIT.MSC doesn't work on the Home Edition.
Hit Start/Run, then copy and paste this:
REG add HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System /v DisableTaskMgr /t REG_DWORD /d 0 /f
and hit OK. I did it on my machine and it worked great.
For your info and future reference, I found this at:
a href="http://experts.about.com/q/Windows-XP-3282/Task-manager-disabled-19.htm"http://experts.about.com/q/Windows-XP-3282/Task-manager-disabled-19.htm/a
I hope this works for you.
Roger
Roger on February 22, 2006 9:56 AMI occasionaly end explorer and restart it with the task manager when I want to reorder items in my startbar. If you activate them all in the reverse order you want, then restart explorer they will appear in an order. (If anyone knows of a program that allows me to reorder them, I would be most greatful)
I also noticed, after this article prompted me to play around with Task Manager, the "Send Message..." button under Users. Very useful for when I need to leave messages for my brother not to touch xyz until I've fixed it.
Whether something is in the Options menu or the View menu seems slightly cryptic to me. For instance, "Show full account name" to me would be under View. But meh.
hola!
i have a worm or trojan eating the heck out of my computer and now my task manager is down and out. msc doesn't work and i don't know what the heck to do. my computer performance is being compromised greatly by this thing. any help would be greatly appreciated!
kari
Kari on March 5, 2006 9:06 AMWhen I do Ctrl+Alt+Del, Task Manager is disabled
Ctrl+Shift+Esc pops the message 'Task Manager has been disabled by your administrator' bear in mind, I am the administrator and has never disabled it. I also have the associating property in gpedit set not to disable it (configured)
WinKey+R taskmgr has the same effect as just mentioned. By the way, I learnt this approach from this very article, which says Taskman instead of Taskmgr. Check that out
How do I get Task Manager reenabled?
Thanks
Wayne Gunn on March 16, 2006 2:33 AMWayne -- did you see Roger's response, about 3 posts above your comment?
Jeff Atwood on March 16, 2006 2:34 AMI had the same problem with the Taks manager not working. I had just used pest patrol and got rid of two pest it found. then i started a scan using avast, updated it and had to reboot. upon restarting is when i couldnt use the task manager.I used the "REG add HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System /v DisableTaskMgr /t REG_DWORD /d 0 /f" fix and it worked instantly. Thanks alot.
Rob on May 14, 2006 12:07 PMthat "REG add HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System /v DisableTaskMgr /t REG_DWORD /d 0 /f" fix works only until I restart my computer, then the same message comes up..any help please?
Alex Gurman on May 20, 2006 6:26 AMWhenever I pull up Task Manager, I only get a list view of the processes, with no tabs at the top. There is no menu for me to change the view to Applications, etc. Does anyone know how to fix this?
Angela on May 28, 2006 12:16 PMJust get SpyBot SD to combat the message that says "Task Manager has been disabled...". It works like a charm and finds and fixes the exact thing that's causing the problem. Better yet, it's free!
Michael on June 1, 2006 1:48 PMTrust me, Spybot SD should fix your problems.
Michael on June 1, 2006 1:49 PMWhenever I pull up Task Manager, I only get a list view of the processes, with no tabs at the top. There is no menu for me to change the view to Applications, etc. Does anyone know how to fix this?
To fix this open task manager and double click the empty space above the window.
Alex on July 18, 2006 3:21 AMThe resolution below really worked!
Hit Start/Run, then copy and paste this:
REG add HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System /v DisableTaskMgr /t REG_DWORD /d 0 /f
and hit OK.
Thanks to the original person who post this!
ianne on July 25, 2006 6:27 AMi have tried everything and still task manager does not work .. plz help me guys ...this doesnt work ..REG add HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System /v DisableTaskMgr /t REG_DWORD /d 0 /f......... sybot search and destroy doesnt work and i dont no wat else to do... i appreciate the help
Me~ on July 29, 2006 3:52 AMi am trying to find out how to limit how many process are running.. i am fairly sure most are not nessessary for windows to run correctly..
zim on August 12, 2006 8:42 AMI often use Task Manager, but as of latley, it doesnt come up, I have had this problem before on a different computer, but I believe the only way to fix it is to Format C:/ and start over, I dont want to do this because I have several several gig's of information, that if I copy, I am afraid the "virus" or what ever is causing my problem will copy with it... any help?
Michael on August 17, 2006 11:42 AMi cant see the tabs but only processes can someone help me
D 90` on August 17, 2006 1:02 PMi can run taskmanager but i cant see the tabs but only processes can someone help me please
mike on September 9, 2006 1:54 PMi can run taskmanager but i cant see the tabs but only processes can someone help me please
mike on September 9, 2006 12:54 PM
i had the same problem i just click the top left hand corner where they should be and i came up not sure if it was a left click or right click {the wife was nagging at the time )
i had the same problem and clicking the top left corner did the work, thanks
berny on September 21, 2006 4:22 AMThe Task Manager Fix is avaliable for FREE at http://www.diskdatarecovery.net/task-manager-has-been-disabled-by-your-administrator
Click Fix Now and it will enable the Task Manager.
diskrecovery on October 19, 2006 11:10 AMAlex, thank you for the doubleclick magic, I have been blanking on the control panel for too long. Trapped in a process onnly view of the ether.
Scott on December 24, 2006 7:56 AMYou mentioned under section 5. Commit Charge:
"And god forbid you ever reach the commit charge limit. I guess then it's time to upgrade to a 64-bit OS."
It isn't necessary to upgrade the OS, or even the memory, to increase this limit. Simply increase the virtual memory. My ComputerPropertiesAdvancedPerformance SettingsAdvancedVirtual Memory Change. Enter a higher value for Initial Size (MB), making sure the Maximum Size is still equal or higher, and click Set, then OK the changes. Within seconds you'll notice the Commit Charge Limit under Task Manager has increased proportionally to how much you increased the virtual memory.
Granted, if you had to do this to avoid hitting the limit, increasing virtual memory will result in even more thrashing, and a memory upgrade would be the better way to go. But it is possible to increase the Commit Charge Limit quickly and without cost.
Andrew on March 4, 2007 8:13 AMMy task manager shortcuts doesn't work any more (ctrl+alt+del and ctrl+shift+esc). And for those using FIREFOX the CLEAR PRIVATE DATA shortcuts don't work either (ctrl+shift+del). The keys work but the Shortcut doesn't, and I am asking Why?
Any solution? Any help will be appreciated!
Harbino on March 27, 2007 3:26 AMI have the same problem. I have tried everything that you said but it still doesn't work. If I go in C:\windowa\system32\taskmgr and doubl click it, it works, but I'd really want ctrl+ald+del to work. Any ideas?
Amarena on April 3, 2007 7:42 AMDoes anyone know how to "reset" the Peak value so, say you make some changes to remove a few memory-hungry processes and want to see what the new, lower peak value is or does this happen automatically with every reboot?
Charley Farley on April 25, 2007 5:37 AMOn several XP machines (and earlier Windoze) I have noticed that if I change the Update Speed in Taskman's Networking, and restore it to Normal later, that the statistics are toasted, using some sort of 3 or 5 second basis instead of the per second basis. Nine years and counting? I'll bet an intern wrote the GUI :)
Hans Schulze on September 4, 2007 11:22 AMNevermind, found a registry hack to fix the problem
http://forums.firingsquad.com/firingsquad/board/message?board.id=softwarethread.id=6673
when i open the task manager
i din't see the shut down menu and extension menu
how can i get that?
Hi,
I have a problem where I am pressing the delete key (doesn't matter which one either the one on the number pad or the other one) and it is going straight to task manager - without the need for me to press ctrl, alt along with it.
Thanks
Jane.
Is there a specific list of what should be running on the processes page? Thank you for your time.
Mahalo,
Damian
I too had the same problem of not able to view the task managers tab views.Alex, thanks for your help.It really worked :-)
xyz on January 27, 2008 7:28 AMroger, thanks for the fix
anyone with the "task man' has been disabled..." run that fix, works in XP Pro as well
don't know how anyone discovered that one
I also have been watching my Networking tab, and it has yet to exceed 5%. I'm streaming video over my gb network from my MyBook World Book Edition and sending 23gb of data over the same gb network to my FreeNas which has an attached 500gb USB WD MyBook drive.
I did not understand this comment...
"Select Columns menu to turn on the optional columns Bytes Sent Per Interval and Bytes Received Per Interval."
"Divide by 1024 and we've got kilobytes per second throughput for that network card."
I did this... I see total utilization at just under 5%... the yellow is at just over 2.5% and the red is just above 0%...
Lets say that Bytes Received is at 3,876,268...
/1024 = 3785
That is 3.7kb/sec, right? (3785.4179...) (we could almost call it 3.8)
I guess that is what I am missing. Telling me how many kilobytes per second doesn't really answer my question, because I want to know how many megaBITS I am getting per second... I guess I'm off to Google to find a byte to bit conversion calculator.
Thanks... I guess... for pointing me in the right direction, anyhow. Why do uber-nerds always make it hard enough that you have to do some of the thinking yourself? I just want the answer...
According to http://www.unitconversion.org/data-storage/kilobytes-to-megabits-conversion.html
0.02890625 mbits/sec... which seems *wrong*.
My 100mb card is operating at .02mb/sec? What have I done wrong?
Donovan on April 4, 2008 9:29 AMSorry. Let me rephrase that. My 1000gb card is operating at .02mb/sec?
Yeah, that makes it sound even better.
Donovan on April 4, 2008 9:31 AMEr...
1gb... 1000mb... you know what I mean.
I'm not a moron... I just drink heavily.
Donovan on April 4, 2008 9:32 AMLets say that Bytes Received is at 3,876,268...
/1024 = 3785
That is 3.7kb/sec, right? (3785.4179...) (we could almost call it 3.8)
WRONG! First, why did you insert a decimal in the result you got?!
The math is wrong anyway because these are bytes given, not bits.
In your ex. for received bytes: (all figures rounded)
3876268 Bytes/s * 8 = 31010144 bits/s
31010144 bs / 1024 = 30283 kbs (kilobits)
30283 kbs / 1024 = 29.57 mbs (megabits)
and converting to bytes:
29.57 mbs / 8 = 3.7 MB/s (MegaBytes)
*this is nothing for a gigabit network but significant for a 100mb LAN.
hey guys happy thanksgiving. i have a question about the ideal number of processes that should be running. i have vista and it says this process: 90
my vista freezes up a lot and then i cant access my shut down menu or my bottom tabs. why is that
Mike Dimmick is right - you are wrong on VM size. VM size is definitely the same as private bytes in the performance monitor.
Chris Sherlock on December 12, 2008 4:26 AMJane,
It sounds like you have a stuck del. key on your k.board. if a reboot doesn't fix it, try taking the key off and cleaning the underside of it or tapping it fairly hard while maybe hitting a couple other nearby keys. I had that happen to me once where my shift key got reversed and a reboot didn't solve the problem. DISCLAIMER: Curly takes no responsibility in the damage of any keyboard or fingers due to suggestions someone may have tried of his. If none of the above doesn't work or doen't sound right to anyone, please speak up. H
Hope I could help.
C
PS-
I forgot the reason I found and came to this website in the first place. running XP and trying to master the taskmgr (yeah, right!). Started having the problem of not being able to see the proc. usage mini icon in my taskbar when I minimize task mgr. and have it set to do so. It minimizes to somewhere invisible(?) because when I try any of the various methods described above to bring up task mgr. (my personal fav. is just ctrl+alt+del) it pops right up; faster like it was minimized somewhere, and not with a delay like it takes when it has to start. Any help would be appreciated.
Thx.
C
Another column to watch on the Processes tab is GDI Objects. A bad GDI leak can make your system crawl even though memory and CPU are normal.
You have to add the column (View / Set Columns / GDI Objects). I add it but leave most of the column out of site, then resize the column when I suspect a GDI leak.
Learned about it here:
a href="http://blogs.technet.com/kclemson/archive/2004/06/21/161986.aspx"http://blogs.technet.com/kclemson/archive/2004/06/21/161986.aspx/a
And of course you've already written about Process Explorer (http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000162.html), but it bear mentioning here.
http://www.sysinternals.com/Utilities/ProcessExplorer.html
Jon Galloway on February 6, 2010 9:46 PMWindows Task manager is good but I'm using Process Explorer
ITS FREE 2 DOWNLOAD AND U CAN REPLACE IT WITH WINDOWS TASK MANAGER
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896653.aspx
Ref: Task Manager, Network Tab
At startup, I have been seeing a burst of RED ( Bytes Sent). about 100K
Just to be sure that it is not some kind of malware sending out logged
data I'd like too know what process or application is doing the sending?
Can anyone tell me how to do this?
Thanks
Roger on May 16, 2010 8:15 AMThe comments to this entry are closed.
|
|
Traffic Stats |