I started out in early 2004 as a blog skeptic. But over the last four years, I've become a born-again believer. In that time, I've written almost a thousand blog entries, and I've read thousands upon thousands of blog entries. As a result, I've developed some rather strong opinions about what makes blogs work so well, and what makes blogs sometimes not work so well.
I'd like to share some of the latter with you today, in a piece I call Thirteen Blog Cliches.
Before I start, realize that these are my opinions. That should be a redundant statement on any blog, much less my own, but I'm putting the disclaimer out there anyway. Just because I run my blog a certain way doesn't make it the right way – or even a very good way. These are preferences, not beliefs. Please don't be offended if your blog, or a blog you enjoy, violates one of my so-called cliches. I'm not trying to single any one person or blog out here. It's your blog, and you don't have to answer to me. I'm just some guy on the internet. Run your blog as you see fit. These are nothing more than broad observations formed over a period of four years where I've been deeply immersed in blog culture.
You may not agree that these are cliches. You might even feel very strongly that I'm wrong about all of this. That's what comments and trackbacks are for. Use them.
This list isn't in any particular order, with one exception. There is nothing I dislike more than the redundant blog calendar widget. It's like a recurring canker sore we can't quite seem to rid ourselves of.
I can't think of a single time I have ever found the blog calendar widget helpful. My computer already has a calendar function, so it's not like I need another calendar displayed in my web browser. Every post carries an obvious datestamp, so I can easily discern when it was published. But knowing whether someone posted an entry on the third tuesday of the month? Utterly useless.
The calendar widget is the vestigial tail of blog engines, evidence of our primordial ancestors. But we've evolved; it's time to lose the tail. Surely there's something more useful we could put in that space.
One of the cardinal rules of web writing is to avoid large blocks of text. There are plenty of excellent web writing guides that exhort you to break up your text, using bullets, numbered lists, quotes, paragraph breaks, images – anything, anything to avoid creating an intimidating wall of dense, impenetrable text.
And they're right. That's what you should do. I do it all the time. I'm doing it right now.
But like all good advice, it can be taken too far. For example, when you find yourself inserting random pictures into your writing for the sole purpose of breaking up the text.
In the above snippet, what does that image have to do with the text? As far as I can tell, absolutely nothing at all. I see this on a disturbing number of blogs and feeds that I regularly read. It's probably due to the influence of Philip Greenspun and his seminal book, Philip and Alex's Guide to Web Publishing, where the text is juxtaposed with random photographs that Philip has taken. It's one of the earliest and best references on web development, and the fact that it's still relevant today despite its age speaks volumes about the quality of Mr. Greenspun's writing. But it's the writing that makes the book a classic, not the amateur photography sprinkled throughout its pages.
As the old adage goes, a picture is worth a thousand words. But you should no more insert a random image into your writing than you would insert a thousand random words into your writing. I don't care how beautiful your photographs are, it's a terrible, irresponsible practice that distracts and harms readability.
And those of you sitting there smugly, with your stock photo library and your peripherally, tangentially, almost-but-not-quite related images that you use to break up your text, don't think I'm not talking about you, either. Because I am. Think about that the next time you read an article about a "web 2.0 bubble" accompanied by – you guessed it – a stock photo of a child blowing a bubble.
Images are not glorified paragraph breaks. Images should contribute to the content and meaning of the article in a substantive way. And if they don't, they should be cut. Mercilessly.
When I find well-written articles on blogs that I want to cite, I take great pains to get the author's name right in my citation. If you've written something worth reading on the internet, you've joined a rare club indeed, and you deserve proper attribution. It's the least I can do.
That's assuming I can find your name.
To be fair, this doesn't happen often. But it shouldn't ever happen. The lack of an "About Me" page – or a simple name to attach to the author's writing – is unforgivable. But it's still a problem today. Every time a reader encounters a blog with no name in the byline, no background on the author, and no simple way to click through to find out anything about the author, it strains credulity to the breaking point. It devalues not only the author's writing, but the credibility of blogging in general.
Maintaining a blog of any kind takes quite a bit of effort. It's irrational to expend that kind of effort without putting your name on it so you can benefit from it. And so we can too. It's a win-win scenario for you, Mr. Anonymous.
I'd like to talk to you about your flair.
Blogs work because they're simple. When we clutter up our blogs with a zillion widgets, features, and add-ons, we're destroying an essential part of what makes blogs worthwhile.

I've lost track of all the times I've clicked on an image in a blog and been hijacked by some crazy JavaScript image loading technique, when a simple link to the image would have sufficed – and probably would have been faster and more convenient. Or when I've moused over an unassuming hyperlink and had an annoying, superfluous image preview of the link pop up when I didn't want it to. And do your readers really want to see pictures of the last 10 visitors to your blog?
Before you add a new "feature" to your blog, consider whether this feature will be useful enough to your readers to overcome the additional complexity it adds to the page. Hint: almost none of them are.
I'm all for linking generously to outside content. We all stand on the shoulders of giants, after all. Although if you look down in today's world, you might find that you're standing on lots and lots of midgets. Large or small, we owe them a debt of gratitude.
Citing your references and influences is a great and necessary thing, but obsessively listing every single blog you read – the so-called "blogroll" – is just noise.
If you're really reading this many blogs, you should be linking to them organically in your blog posts, in a sort of natural quid pro quo. Wearing a giant blogroll on your sleeve is an empty gesture. I'm reminded of the distasteful way that blogs in giant ad networks (such as Weblogs, Inc) spam every page with a huge list of internal links to their other blogs. It feels artificial and insincere.
Publish your OPML if you think organic links in your writing aren't telling the whole story, but avoid cluttering up your page with a huge, spammy blogroll.
I'm a big fan of tagging. It's far superior to the old method of placing everything in hierarchical folders. Tag categories on blogs are moderately useful, particularly for bloggers who tend to bounce around among many different topics. What I've never found useful, however, is the stereotypical tag cloud visualization, where the size of the tag word varies with its frequency.
The perception is that tag cloud visualizations are cool, like badges of honor for the tagging club. The reality is that tag cloud visualizations are chaotic, noisy, and unusable. Keep the tagging, lose the cloud. A simple sorted list of tags, along with the number of posts associated with each tag, is much more effective.
Advertising is a fact of life. People need to feed their starving children. I get it. I've even reluctantly entered the field myself. But is it really necessary to make your blog look like Times Square? Does every square inch of whitespace have to be filled with paid links, Google AdSense, and ad banners?
In the process of researching this article, I found a related article on blog usability that's a perfect – even ironic – example of how you can hurt your usability with excessive, obnoxious advertising. It's everywhere.
It is almost never in the reader's interest to see advertisements, so my advice is to tread very lightly, and be respectful of your audience. Bad advertising is so prevalent that if you take the time to advertise responsibly, you may find that readers appreciate you for it.
Well, probably not, but it can't hurt to try.
I don't begrudge anyone their right to post whatever it is they think they need to post on their blog. But let's be perfectly clear: your readers aren't coming to your blog to read about you. They're coming to your blog to find out what it can do for them. If you find your blog turning into a diary of your daily activities, you'll have a very limited audience unless you happen to be a real world celebrity. Even my wife isn't particularly interested in the minutiae of what I do every day. Why would I expect my readers to be?
That said, blogs are a place for writers to find an interested audience, and a place for readers to find a helpful peer and a unique voice. It's OK to be yourself; at some level, it is a cult of personality: people are reading not only because your content is useful to them, but because they like you. It's normal to inject a regular dose of yourself into the conversation.
But like Tabasco sauce and other powerful seasonings, a little YOU goes a long way. A really long way. Write accordingly.
If you haven't posted anything new to your blog in a while, don't waste our time with apologies. Just write! The best apology is new and improved content. Maybe with a wee bit more consistency this time, though.
The most important piece of advice I give anyone who asks me about blogging is this: pick a schedule you can live with, and stick to it. That doesn't mean you should post substandard crap, of course, but I find that talent is far less important than enthusiasm. And the best way to demonstrate your enthusiasm – and to improve – is to get out there and write. Regularly.
And if you can't muster the enthusiasm for writing regularly, move on. But don't stop creating.
I find meta-blogging – blogging about blogging – incredibly boring. I said as much in a recent interview on a site that's all about blogging (hence the title, Daily Blog Tips). I wasn't trying to offend or shock; I was just being honest. Sites that contain nothing but tips on how to blog more effectively bore me to tears.
If you accept the premise that most of your readers are not bloggers, then it's highly likely they won't be amused, entertained, or informed by a continual stream of blog entries on the art of blogging. Even if they're filled with extra bloggy goodness.
Meta-blogging is like masturbating. Everyone does it, and there's nothing wrong with it. But writers who regularly get out a little to explore other topics will be healthier, happier, and ultimately more interesting to be around – regardless of audience.
One of the most pernicious problems in blogging is the echo chamber effect. Most blog entries merely regurgitate what other people have said or add vapid commentary on top of news articles and press releases. Only the tiniest fraction of blog entries are original content, and only a tiny fraction of that fraction is worth your time. One of my very favorite articles is Chris Pirillo's piece on 10 Ways to Eliminate the Echo Chamber. Chris has been blogging for a very, very long time and he has the battle scars to prove it. This call to action should be required reading for every blogger. With pop quizzes.
It's always been deeply disappointing to me that we have the whole of human history to talk about, and most people can't get past what happened today. If I wanted news, I'd visit one of the hundreds of news sites that do nothing but news every day. Putting yourself in the news business is a thankless, unending grind. Don't do it.
If everyone knows about it, what value does that information have? Three years from now, will anyone care that Apple released a new iPod on that particular day? My advice here is almost contrarian: if everyone else is talking about it, that means you should avoid talking about it. Switch things up. Seek out uncommon sites with unique information. Dig down to original sources and read the material everyone is commenting (comments on top of comments on top of comments) endlessly on.
If all you can find to talk about is what's already popular, you're not trying hard enough. Form your own opinion. Do your own research. Go out of your way to blaze a new trail and create something we haven't already seen hundreds of times before.
Yes, exactly like this one.
The problem with Top (n) Lists is that they become a substitute for critical thinking, the classic, laziest possible use of Cliff's Notes that every college professor and high school teacher fears. You're supposed to read the book, then read the Cliff's Notes as a companion to the book – not use the Cliff's notes as a substitute for reading the book.
Lists are a great convention. They make sense, people understand them, and they're a logical way to structure your writing. But don't let lists become a crutch. I'm always taken aback when I see the "most popular" posts on a blog dominated by Top (n) Lists. Shortcuts are only meaningful if you know what it is, exactly, you're cutting. If all you read is whatever Top (n) Lists have managed to float to the top of today's Reddit or Digg homepage, then you've cheated yourself out of the deeper experience of reading a complete book.
If you find that the Top (n) List convention is a go-to tool in your writing toolkit, consider rebalancing your writing portfolio with longer, more in-depth pieces as well. Not everything should be a sprint; throw a few small marathons in there somewhere to complement your short distance skills.
A blog without comments is not a blog. Yes, there are exceptions for massively popular blogs where comments clearly don't scale. But until that applies, the value of the two-way conversation far outweighs any minor inconvenience on your part. Writing is inconvenient. Get used to it, and get over yourself. The sum total of community contributions is far more useful than any one thing you'll ever write.
Besides, It's an open secret in the blogging community that the comments are often better than the original blog entry itself. Would you browse Amazon without the user reviews? No? Then why would you willingly choose to run your blog that way?
Don't be afraid of comments. Embrace them. Moderate them. The community will respect you for it, and your blog will be better for it as well.
This piece ended up being much longer than I originally intended. But I've had a lot of this stuff on my chest for years, and I wanted to do it justice. I also needed to explain myself in a constructive way so I don't end up offending too many people.
I've already broken at least two of my own rules with this very post. How cliche.
Discuss.
This list presumes all blogs have some common purposes, which I believe is a false presumption. For example, some blogs are intended to be diary-like archives primarily for the author's small circle of interested people, and gawkers do so at their own peril. And some blogs are extremely nichey (is that a word?), and strictly for news/analysis about a very specific topic, at topic about which news occurs at only very irregular intervals in time.
cat on August 20, 2007 8:42 AMOne of my blogs had a calendar. It was part of a default style. It was a handy way to get a link to a single entry. There must be another way to do this, because i didn't notice that it's gone.
I might get inspired to write a blog entry that breaks all of these rules. Should be fun. I could start by talking about how my computer has been down for the past week, then apologizing for not producing new entries anyway. It could have a custom calendar showing the dates and times when it went down, and how it came back up. I'd piss and moan about how much work it was getting it going, and how some stupid thing brought it down again just before i was going to start my backups. Maybe an image of my car, half dismantled could go in the middle. I could disable my "about me" link, and while at it, shut down my RSS feed, disable comments. I don't currently carry ads. Maybe i could make up some fake ads - you know, like Saturday Night Live. "Super Colon Blow cereal", or something. A bullet list pointing out a dozen blogs that haven't had content for at least a month... it would take some research.
OK, so i've given away the plot. Maybe i won't.
Do you ever get tired of reading so many comments? Okay, so maybe I'm just jealous. ;o)
This is an insightful list, and you provide us with good reasoning and advice; even tough I don't agree with all topics - for example, I think tag clouds are really useful and interesting as a means to provide a quick glimpse of what a blog is about, and I don't suppose there's anything wrong with writing a dear diary-like if that's what you're going for. Consistency is the key to success, IMO.
I commend you on writing a great article, but I pity the users who will blindly follow every single advice. (what was bullet #3 about, anyway?)
Slice of Life on August 20, 2007 10:06 AMThere's a third way to improve readability that you should have mentioned: limit column width.
I recently redid my blog layout to be fixed-width.
Article/text-based sites are simply hard to read (and look crappy) in high resolutions. Plus, with the ubiquitous acceptance of widescreen displays, the number of users who may be reading your site in a disproportionately wide resolution is ever-increasing.
http://zinknation.net/Zinknation+Redone++No+Longer+A+Liquid+Layout.aspx
Kevin ZInk on August 20, 2007 10:37 AMGreat list. I'm sure I'm guilty of a few!
Lotta on August 20, 2007 10:56 AMGuilty on lots of these - you've seriously made me re-think calendars and Blogrolls. But blogging about blogs - mea culpa but I try to do it with home made comix does that exempt me?
PS that unecessary photo looks to me like the entrance to the Gents public toilets at the corner of Aldwych and The Strand in Central London - are they taking the piss?
Clive on August 20, 2007 11:11 AMORANGE!
Anybody already point out that Jeff is breaking #10 with this post?
mcgurk on August 20, 2007 11:22 AMVery good points, Jeff! I really like your posts about blog and site optimization!
David Chen(ITSkyline Blog) on August 20, 2007 11:36 AMGreat post, keep up the good work. Think I learn or read something new every week on your blog. Glad to see you learned something since the #000001 #000002 entries.. :D
Still can't find a rss reader I like, so you site is still viewed the old way. :)
/happy reader since 2005
Peter Palludan on August 20, 2007 11:38 AMRe. #8 and the rest - don't forget there are people who blog as an outlet, or just so their friends can keep in touch. They're not trying to get famous, "find an audience", or get anything else out of a blog.
Blogging isn't a religion.
My personal Pet Peeve, though? Right-click blocking scripts, with messages like "OMG teh kontentz be (C) me! Donut steelz!" - they both keep me from doing useful things like open links in a new window/tab, and Idon't stop me saving your precious images/i. Stop it, people. Just stop.
Sigivald on August 20, 2007 1:05 PMCalendar widgets are ok if you post only occasionally and have no tags. Otherwise, I agree, they are a waste of space.
For #8: This ain't your diary. I'd change this to Pick a subject and Stick to it. Online diaries are fine, just don't advertise as a technical guru, and post your personal stuff. Take The Fat Cyclist. Pretty straightforward blog about a guy losing weight to do cycling. It was pretty popular. There was also a blog about lists; it was funny and that's all it contained.
Tim on August 20, 2007 1:06 PMAll of those are minor compared to
(1) Posts that are undated. Strangely enough it seems to be the MSM that do this the most. Whole classes of posts are just worthless without the date.
(2) (Related to (1)): useless cutesy differential dates on comments like "3 days later". The reason nobody was doing this years ago is NOT because the Rails helper didn't exist yet.
I find rather...amusing.... the way people likes to point the "mistakes" of the author of this post. One of the most recurring ones ive seen is the "you say metabloging is boring yet you do it WITH THIS POST" well yeah, hes metabloging right now cause it IS the reason of the post.
What i "think" he may refer to is to metablog as an "habit". i agree with the top (n) lists, it indeed is a good tool to direct people's attention to something BUT it also "prevents" them of reading what is NOT in that list. tag clouds are annoying unless they are well designed, which regretably doesnt happen very often.
Calendars.. yeah... i like better a search function and an Archive.
About the random, arbitrary images... yeah, they are a burden, because they often distract people from the original content thinking "hmm,... what could be the relation of this image?" then they are more interested in the thinking of the relation than on the original purpose of the post. and well, after all, how long would it take you to find a proper image to post?.
I dont quite agree with the Diary cliche. indeed, some people may not like it, but some people may do. dont remove it or encourage it. just set it as an additional feature among your contents.
"World Conquering 101"
"why cars collide?"
"my Diary"
"subatomic particles FAQ"
etc.
im tired. ill stop writing now.
im fully aware of the ortographical and gramatical mistakes. i DONT speak english and dont feel like IMPROVING right now.
"I can't think of a single time I have ever found the blog calendar widget helpful."
I don't have one in my public blog, but in my Confluence newsblog on our internal wiki, I have one (well, everyone does), and it's essential for my bosses to find the status report for such-and-such a day.
It's doubly useful because I'm the manager, so my daily status update contains our velocity, code coverage metrics, and a recording of our daily stand-up meeting.
But no, I don't have one in my regular blog.
Susan Davis on August 21, 2007 2:07 AMRegarding anonymity, I have one friend who blogs under his real name who has become unemployable in his field due to his rather strong opinions on politics and use of hyperbole to express them. Another frined ended up getting death threats for something he posted on his blog. Not the Bevis Butthead grade threats via comments, either. He was actually contacted by the FBI about specific, credible threats that had been made regarding his life. I'll stick with semi-obscurity, thanks...
Cybrludite on August 21, 2007 4:38 AMI'm curious: what about tag clouds that are implemented as more of a weighted list? There are still varying sizes for the more popular tags, but they're all in a list form.
Luke on August 21, 2007 8:15 AMI think your list, particularly points 8 and 11, is targeted at a particular subset of the blogging community. Specifically the rather vocal "I feel my opinions are important and should be listened to but nobody's paying me" subset.
There are other types of blogs out there though...
For example there is the private blog used to communicate with friends and family who may or may not be geographically isolated from you. For these people the blog IS their diary, so point 8 is moot.
And then there's the journalist-blogger who's job is to report on what happened TODAY, and to them point 11 is rather moot.
But otherwise a good list, even if the post does violate half of its own rules (particularly numbers 10 12)
apparently my trackback didn't work, so here's my post about this post...
http://nstryker.com/blog/2007/08/20/stereotypical
While I agree with the majority of comments, I disagree with the calendar one, if that calendar indicates what days posts are made on. When I first come to a blog it's usually through a search engine or link from another blog. I'll get the nugget of info I came for, then look around.
At this point I've already determined if the contents of the blog are interesting to me. So how do I determine if a blog should be added to my reading list? It's whether or not the blogger produces that content on some sort of consistent basis.
By far, the quickest and easiest way to determine that is via the calendar control. A quick glance at it, over a 3 month time frame should be sufficient to determine the blogging pattern. If it's on some consistent schedule, weekly, daily, etc, then I'm more likely to look closer. If on the other hand the blog posts are seemingly random and sporadic, the browser tab gets closed and I go on my way.
The second area I agree / disagree is the tag cloud. I find the tag cloud visually disorienting. However it would be nice to have some indicator with the number of posts per tag. Either the ability to sort by number of posts, or the actual number in parens () out beside it.
Arcane Code on August 21, 2007 12:47 PMI already keep all these tips with my exciting innovative and up to date blog. I think I am so stereotypical that I might try breaking some of them just for a laugh...
mutleythedog on August 23, 2007 4:48 AMThe problem with relying on comments for more discussion is that a large number of readers will never continue on to them, and will never get that benefit, especially if they show up early when few exist. In aggregate, comments become a giant solid wall of text, regardless of their individual merits. This page is a perfect example of where it becomes too time-consuming to even skim everything - so I mostly read the orange ones. ;) Still, I only read the chaotic opposite end of the spectrum, Slashdot, under duress, so it's not all bad.
Bloggers like Larry Osterman do great jobs with this - either an unintended follow-up post is made summarizing the most interesting comment threads and expanding on them, or that's quickly done at the start of the next related entry. Either way, you get the best of the discussion without needing to spend the time reading everything.
Pure blogs probably aren't the best way to do this, but there's still ways to help without ceding some front-page space to Anonymous.
Foxyshadis on August 23, 2007 5:48 AMam I the only one who sees himself in everything Jeff posts about blogging? :)
engtech @ IDT on August 23, 2007 6:04 AMI know Blog services (one or two) that do not commit any of these errors. Do you now what heppens to them? No onen joins, users COMPLAIN that those are NOT a blog or that they wouldn't be "professional" - as if they would know! Mostly gangs of teenagers talking of pets lol.
Of course, the issue is that once a blog has made one of these errors, and had the venture to be among the first ones, and is therefore successful because it sowed amidst dearth, we have a diligent herd of sheep that replicate what the other blog did in order to emulate its success.
Therefore, those errors too replicate themselves as viruses, get installed on every machine, and do you know what happens then? That also our audiences got irretrievably MISeducated to consider a bad paradigm as good design and an error as a... feature.
You can give all the good counseling you may want, and all your points here are exceptional. You missed one though: tiny fonts: all blogs have tiny fonts, normally light colour on white background, and all leave about 50% of the page blank as "margins".
Successful NONSENSE.
But no matter how good your points are: they will all break against the obtusity that says: we have been used that a blog MUST look like this, if you make a blog look not like blogs ARE but like they OUGHT to be, then... they are not blogs! Do not look like one!!
That's how folks reason. Now, try to change their minds, the minds of folks who have problem even changing route to go to work!
Alberto on August 23, 2007 7:35 AMMy favorite, by far, was the over-advertise ridden article on usability. I couldn't find the text of the article when I initially brought it up. I spend about a million dollars before I learned a think about usability.
Alas. Goodbye calendar!
Matthew Moran on August 23, 2007 1:40 PMJust ran across this list, and it's one of the most cliched pieces of blogging drivel I've ever read.
Just kidding. I agree on most of your points, especially with the calendar widget.
Matt Robison on August 24, 2007 4:15 AMWow. I just started a blog today, and I follow 9 of your 10 rules!
Except. I turned comments off. Call it not a blog then. I don't care what my readers have to say.
Peter Shickele on August 24, 2007 9:14 AMLemmings, the lot of you!
You should do something new instead of simply rehashing stuff. Shit can only be kneaded and formed finitely. It also doesnt pay to polish shit as well. I can't count the number of times I have "red x'ed" a website.
Do something outrageously insane. Steve Jobs released the Macintosh only when it was insane.
"I am going to rip my head off and shit down my neck!"
How many people do you think said the above line? See, number one right here!
Stop making love in the dark. Watch your honey, get close and feel the pulsations.
Observe. Think. Scramble.
Mark Tee B.
Mark T.B. on August 24, 2007 9:38 AMGreat article, I'll definitely bookmark this and try to work on changing things up in my blog. Hopefully that will attract more discussion to my blog (one of the main reasons I blog is to have these discussions with others, but alas, I am apparently a bore).
Joseph A Nagy Jr on August 25, 2007 12:30 PMIsn't this post "blogging about blogging"? :) (which breaks rule #10)
Simone Chiaretta on August 27, 2007 10:29 AMit is blogging about blogging AND a top (n) thingies, Showing that no rule is universal, including this one...
renato on August 28, 2007 9:24 AMTotally agree with all points, but you forgot one of my biggies: the tiresome, faux-modest, faux-self-effacing tagline: "random ramblings", "random nonsense", "brain droppings", "mindless random etc. etc.". (If YOU really thing your blog's content is crap, why are you blogging??).
Jeff K on August 29, 2007 9:19 AMI agree, Meta Blogging is the biggest waste of space, especially when the bloggers aren't business people, and more like homebodies craving easy dollars. Annoying, mindless and boring.
Anastasia on August 30, 2007 2:38 AMI'm guilty of a couple of these things so I see you avoiding my blog. My blog is a personal blog. Somedays I share the fact my daughter wants a tattoo and other times I blog about blogging. It is those blog posts that you call annoying that brings me traffic.
Rose on September 6, 2007 2:36 AMMy reply (9/5) to this post: http://rogerowengreen.blogspot.com/2007/09/metablogging-about-someone-elses.html
Roger Green on September 6, 2007 2:54 AMInteresting, Jeff, Thanks.
Actually a mini-epiphany of sorts, may even wind up changing my perceptions of blogs... It was both surprising and refreshing to find someone putting some real thought into the publishing aspects. Know I'll prob'ly be flogged for that somewhere in absentia.
Till now I considered blogs as belonging to 2 categories: Tech articles called blogs because To Blog is popular, Rants. One of the chief good points was/is bloggers know about spell checkers and use decent grammar; something that on a good day can't be said for many, many pro journalists. I'm terrible at spelling and grammar so I watch for it.
At the end-of-the-day maybe you'll have wound up changing my perception. And while that tidbit won't matter to anyone but me, it is just cause to say Thanks once again.
Homer on September 6, 2007 12:51 PMUh-oh, I'm on my way to the back of the class, then. Give me a couple of months to improve my postings and we'll see if my blog is any better...
Sarah Whittaker on October 27, 2007 4:39 AMdear jeff
your article is very interesting!:)
Can you explain to me why i must scroll this long page to find the post button? Is not more usable a post button at the end of your article?
many thanks
sara
I started "blogging" back when I was just a 16 year old with a Diaryland page back in '98. I wasn't trying to "connect" with some giant audience, but rather finding a place to park my thoughts. Within a year or so, I had a huge readership, which only grew each time I changed blogging software (I'm NOT a computer person) and I was amazed at how much of a "rock star" I became just talking about my 'zines, my girlfriends and all the other ridiculous crap going on in my life. People sent me gifts, financed my trip to a big zine convention, etc. That was never my intention!
My blog broke all your little rules. shrugs.
Keight on June 13, 2008 7:14 AMExcellent post, ill be taking all these tips on board!
Joyfalula on July 7, 2008 4:26 AMA year on, and this article is still receiving lots of great attention.
I've read it before, taken a lot of it to heart. But this year I am seriously considering a lot more options offered/suggested.
Great reading.
Good points. The only one I disagree is #8. If someone wants to write a public diary: why not? If nobody reads it, who cares? If there is someone out there that is going to read it, that is ok too, right?
Maybe the advice should be changed into: Don't expect to get a lot of regular readers if your blog is a lot of personal bla-bla with no value to the subscriber.
David on July 14, 2008 9:06 AMGreat post but I want to disagree with the random pics part. A pic like that which has little or no connection to the post is a nice quirk in itself. It helps you to add that bit of zaniness to ur article in ur own style.
And also about the anonymous part of posting-it works well for people who shy away from too much attention and love the obscurity of the web. Thats one of the advantages of the web, right?
B on October 29, 2008 5:13 AMNice to see so good informations. Very good blog.
twojeanonse on December 31, 2008 7:30 AMI'm guilty of a couple of these things so I see you avoiding my blog. My blog is a personal blog. Somedays I share the fact my daughter wants a tattoo and other times I blog about blogging. It is those blog posts that you call annoying that brings me traffic.
http://megavibor.ru/
Without reading any other user comments first...
Disagreement on #8, This Ain't Your Diary:
YES IT IS!! Or, it could be. I think a better way to phrase it would be Don't Make Your Blog Your Diary...Unless It Is! As to your remark ...let's be perfectly clear: your readers aren't coming to your blog to read about you. They're coming to your blog to find out what it can do for them. That might just be to find out about you! If you're writing about soap operas, nobody cares that you watched today's episode while at your best friend's house. But if another friend wants to check in on you, then she might be interested where you were today, and that can even be a starting point for a conversation later. I know I wrote too much already; I'm just asking that you don't forget what made blogs popular: writing about oneself, whether as general statements or--well--as your diary.
And quick, on #13 (I've a sneaky feeling this would be your most disagreed upon point):
A blog without a comments section is...a blog without a comments section. Blog = Web log = catch-all phrase for any sort of running, regularly posted to online journal/diary/newspaper/list/thematic work. Comments are an AMAZING addition to that, and quite possibly what made them so successful in the first place! But... to omit reader comments might be in poor judgment... or it might serve your need. And those needs would vary greatly based upon who's writing and why.
Point of interest... how many comments area conversations tend to be mostly disagreements or mostly agreements... so rarely are they discussions.... just my irrelevant $.02.
RH on January 30, 2009 5:18 AMA year on, and this article is still receiving lots of great attention.
I've read it before, taken a lot of it to heart. But this year I am seriously considering a lot more options offered/suggested.
Great reading.
http://resmontazh.ru/
A hearty, thank-you-handshake to you.
ankita on February 2, 2009 4:49 AMGreat advice for everyone. I'm glad I stumbled across your site!
Redliner on February 19, 2009 4:34 AMIn general, I agree, except for -- in some cases -- rule #2. (No, not just because *I* do it!)
Several reasons in favor:
1. Some people are constitutionally nearly incapable of reading long pure-text articles. This crops up a lot with ADHD (the real thing), and maybe with Rand's N.A.D.D. as well. In any case, the pictures may be expanding the potential audience for your blog content.
2. Sometimes the pictures aren't as random as they appear...they are, while not directly related on the surface, actually intended to add content, context, or overtone to the explicit text of the post.
For example, in my latest blog post (http://exold.com/article/how-i-spent-my-winter-vacation-part-1), I placed three photos, all of which *could* be construed as off-topic.
The first picture, of the African storyteller, is an indication that this particular post is in full-on story-telling mode (this is echoed by the text). A secondary tidbit, for those who click through the photo's source link, is that the appearance of *this* storyteller is an indication that spring is on the way, a nice reminder to those of us who woke up to snow on the ground yesterday ;P.
The second photo, of a maze, visually reinforces the figurative maze I discuss in the post. Those clicking through the source link will probably find it an even more appropriate reference to my situation.
The third photo is another seasonal reference, and is in fact almost entirely unrelated to the post's topic. It's intended as more of a sign-off to leave the reader with a bit of refreshment on his or her further journeys.
I could have written the post without the visual flavor enhancers, but if we're not going to try to add subtlety and richness to our writing, we may as well just post telegraph-style updates: QUIT JOB STOP STARTED ART BUSINESS STOP NOW LOOKING FOR JOB STOP. (I'm not trying to say you've advocated this :).)
3. (Bet you forgot we were amidst an enumerated list.) If you don't like the pictures in a particular blog post, it seems an easy solution would be to ignore said pictures. They may annoy you, but they neither pick your pocket nor break your leg (as Jefferson said in a different context).
Other than that fundamental issue, you've got a good list of bad things here.
Since we're on the subject, I'll go ahead and toss in a link to an amusing (*I* thought...) take on the whole Top-N List meme: http://exold.com/article/the-top-69-subjects-for-top-10-lists-that-i-came-up-with-the-other-day-in-the-bathroom-while-i-was-getting-ready-for-work.
Very interesting and useful writing. I’m trying to take a critical view on my blog and I found your points helpful to analyse it.
Triin Vihur on May 4, 2009 7:27 AMGreat post but I want to disagree with the random pics part. A pic like that which has little or no connection to the post is a nice quirk in itself. It helps you to add that bit of zaniness to ur article in ur own style.
http://landprof.ru
Great list. Number 2 Random Images Arbitrarily Inserted In Text is one that really helped me. My problem has always been that I have so much to say, I would ramble on with thousands of words. When I broke it up with images, everything changed. PR went up, traffic etc.
CNC Machine Shop on May 8, 2009 8:30 AMInteresting blog. Found this article and I note that despite the fact that it is now nearly 2 years old (a long time in the world of the interweb!) most of it still holds true. Particularly number 4 (more buttons and widgets to click on than anyone could possibly ever need!) and number 7 - blogs (and other sites) are still plastered with ads. http://www.tshirtinsight.com/
MartinTSI on May 14, 2009 2:49 AMhi
nice site,liked a lot
[url=http://www.carquotes365.com]Car Quotes[/url]
I go through lots of websites a day and only a few catch my attention. I read this whole article. Very well written and down to earth.
Karla on June 4, 2009 6:20 AMhttp://www.askthecoders.com
http://www.askthecoders.com/forum
Nice post, the cliches is about right and its unusual to find a blog that doesnt fall into at least half of them!
steve on June 23, 2009 12:46 PMwell, that is really good to know.
supra skytop on July 29, 2009 9:57 AMpretty sure you are an expert.
supra skytop on July 29, 2009 9:57 AMWow, I fit in 2 of your clichés and sometimes I lean towards another 2. Plus, I can't bring myself to post at an acceptable rate. Seems like I'm not reaching blogging success anytime soon :(
J/k. I read your disclaimer. BTW, I'd like to say that I really like this blog. At the very least you made me do two things: fire up my own blog and buy a copy of Steve McConnell's Coding Horror!
Silma on August 10, 2009 4:03 AMit's really helpfull for me............thank you
Coding on August 18, 2009 3:55 AMI turned my calendar widget in to a heat map of my activity over a given month, and I think it turned out rather well. I don't have it on the homepage though so the chances are no one ever sees it: http://simonwillison.net/2007/Aug/17/
Simon Willison on February 6, 2010 10:03 PMIronically enough you violated #10 w/ this post ;-). That being said, you rarely metablog so I'll let it slide this time. I've personally learned a lot of these the hard way, and more often than not it was because I saw something on another blog that annoyed me, only to realize I was guilty of the exact same behavior on my site.
jayson knight on February 6, 2010 10:03 PMI remember taking the default calendar off my blog thinking:
"Well, it would be helpful if someone missed a week of posts and wanted to quickly navigate back to them, but, that's not going to happen often enough for me to leave this otherwise useless component on the page."
Then I got to the arbitrary images part; I was fairly certain I only included vaguely witty images, but there was a small fraction of me that thought the image of Sherlock Holmes was pointless. Upon further inspection, I'm pleased to say that Sherlock can stay.
Actually, now that I look at everything for a third time, it seems that I don't break any of the "Atwood Guidelines of Taste". My 4 readers had better appreciate it!
Aaron Forster on February 6, 2010 10:03 PMGreat list! For the most part, I agree about allowing comments, but some blogs serve different purposes than others.
Many blogs, such as Daring Fireball, are a one-way microphone for opinions. DF reveals Gruber's perspective on things... and people still come. His is an "answer" blog.
Others, like my own blog, are meant to be "question" blogs - we seek input and throw out ideas to be torn apart like meat to rabid dogs. Here, comments are key.
Jason Swadley on February 6, 2010 10:03 PMLike you I started early, mostly with just regular websites.
There's so many little details to remember, but I have discovered the value of blogs however. They are much simpler to operate than traditional websites.
I've also discovered the value of askimet too! lol
Cy on July 9, 2010 4:16 PMAll above informations and presentations are good...
just click if looking web design information.....
www.webconnecttechnologies.com
if looking for investment news click beelow link..
www.sspathania.com
What you say is right, but this things come bundled with wordpress.com official hosting. They offer two-column layout and 1/3rd of the page is left blank.
People think that the page is looking vacant and tries to stuff it by using widgets. I did the something when I took WordPress.cOm as the only solution to quickly cook some tutorials and my thoughts. I write about stuff that I found it hard to learn.
I have now moved to a shared hosting provider and will soon learn how to customize wordpress as per my need.
This is a world of free thoughts and it is still hard to present it for free :(
Pradeep Sharma on August 14, 2011 12:16 AMI know I'm reading this about 4 years after you wrote it, but just wanted to say I love the article!
I am making some of the mistakes (oops) and then I am apparently doing a few things right.
Thank you for sharing this...do you have any updates?
I'm an infant blogger and hungry for knowledge!
Karen
http://www.ablogtoremember.com/?p=329
The comments to this entry are closed.
|
|
Traffic Stats |