I've talked about HTTP compression in IIS 6.0, and HTTP compression using Net.WebClient, but what about deploying ASP.NET websites to servers you don't control, eg, third party hosts? How can we enable compression in that scenario?
We can implement HTTP compression on a per-website basis in ASP.NET through a compression HttpModule. Sure enough, a little searching dug up the blowery.org HttpCompressionModule. And it works very well; the current version has been around a while, and already reflects a number of significant bugfixes. After modifying the Web.config..
<httpModules>
<add name="CompressionModule" type="blowery.Web.HttpCompress.HttpModule,
blowery.web.HttpCompress"/>
</httpModules>
..and deploying the two dlls to the \bin folder, it passes the sniffer test: the HTTP compression header is set, and the pages are sent to the browser as gzipped binary data.
I did, however, run into one bug related to my ASP.NET Unhandled Exception Handling HttpModule-- for some reason, the compression module prevented the exception module from dumping output to the webpage via Response.Write and Response.End. The automatic emails and text logs worked fine, so the code was executing, but the response output methods had no effect. Clearly, some kind of problem related to having two HttpModules running at the same time.. a quick change to the blowery source fixed that:
void CompressContent(object sender, EventArgs e) {
HttpApplication app = (HttpApplication)sender;
if (app.Server.GetLastError() != null) {
return;
}
[.. rest of code snipped]
Basically, in the case of any Exception-- if it bubbles up this far, it's definitely unhandled-- we want to return immediately and do nothing in the compression handler. I am not sure if this is the optimal fix, but without it, all I get is the default .NET exception page. And who wants that?
Posted by Jeff Atwood View blog reactions
« Rebuttal Rebuttal Don't Be Afraid to Break Stuff »
Hi Jeff,
What rev of ASP.NET are you running on? Sadly, there are some serious problems with how filters work with regards to Response.End in most of the shipping editions of ASP.NET. The filter design feels like a bit of an after-thought and doesn't work well in anything but the most basic situations. :(
--ben (author of httpcompress)
ben on February 19, 2006 08:56 PMI would go one further in order to catch Response.Redirect() also...
void CompressContent(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
HttpApplication app = (HttpApplication)sender;
// Only compress normal responses.
if (app.Context.Response.StatusCode != 200 || app.Server.GetLastError() != null)
return;
This results in only compressing normal responses which I think is a reasonable compromise.
Marcus
Marcus Mac Innes on May 28, 2006 08:30 AMnice topic i never thought about this before
anand on August 27, 2007 02:37 PMhi
I want to know how i can implement a http compression?
Wow, the programmer did a good job. By the first test the tool does compress the request. But the tool does compress my javascript on my page,too. So my page doesn't work any more. Navigation is impossible now.
Are the any other tools which can solve this problem?
| Content (c) 2008 Jeff Atwood. Logo image used with permission of the author. (c) 1993 Steven C. McConnell. All Rights Reserved. |