The standard computer keyboard is the quintessential human input device. Although it's amazingly adaptable, a recent Tom's Hardware review of the Ergodex DX1 underscores the limitations of the keyboard as an input device-- and also highlights some of the crazier keyboard alternatives out there:
So far, technology hasn't provided us with the ability to customize a hardware interface that meets our individual needs. Thus, we are usually forced to retreat to the 138-year-old quintessence of ubiquity: Christopher Sholes' "QWERTY" keyboard.
![]()
This is a collection of just a few of the author's pit stops along his quest to find the perfect input peripheral. (The rest can be found in a landfill somewhere.) They are, clockwise from the top: The Devilfish, Saitek Command Pad, Ideazon Zboard, Essential Reality's P5 Glove, Belkin's Nostromo Speedpad N52, and Microsoft's Strategic Commander.
Keyboard alternatives have always fascinated me. I've owned two of the peripherals the author lists, and I recently ordered the Ergodex DX1.
Unfortunately, my unit arrived DOA and is in the process of being exchanged, but you can read reviews of this unique "have it your way" keyboard in the following places:
None of these devices, including the Ergodex, are positioned as true "throw away your keyboard" alternatives. I'm not sure that's even possible; I can tell you from personal experience that the struggle to defeat a decade of existing keyboard muscle memory is a losing battle. It's really the same problem the Dvorak keyboard layout has always had. However, these keyboard alternative don't replace but complement your existing keyboard by presenting an optimized subset of what you already know. Even then, it's a tricky business. But I suspect that the extreme flexibility of the Ergodex will make it workable where all the others failed.
Should we be at all concerned with an input device that has a button reserved for "Bug Report"? Maybe spend some more time on the software before moving to a peripheral.
Tom Clancy on June 4, 2005 11:03 AMIt's common for apps in beta testing to have menu items for bug reporting. So I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and assume this app was still under development ;)
Jeff Atwood on June 5, 2005 7:04 PMI'm kind of fond of this one myself: http://abkey.biz/products.htm
I'm still planning on ordering one eventually.
Chris Wallace on June 6, 2005 7:24 AMJeff, I'm a big fan of having extra keys for common functions. But regarding the DX-1, do you think that the ability to heavily control the layout of the buttons makes a big difference; as compared to a more traditional fixed layout, lotsa-buttons peripheral (like this one: <a href="http://www.ymouse.com/xkeys/xkpro.php).">http://www.ymouse.com/xkeys/xkpro.php).</a>
A keyboard I used for quite a while is the Kinesis Contoured keyboard (<a href="http://www.kinesis-ergo.com).">http://www.kinesis-ergo.com).</a> Unfortunately, I used it to the point of failure, having purchased it almost ten years ago.
Now I'm still trying to save up for a replacement, since prices haven't gone down at all on those keyboards. Meanwhile, I torture my carpal tendons daily on a standard keyboard.
Something that the Kinesis keyboard addresses that normal--even so-called 'ergonomic' split keyboards--don't address at all is this:
Fingers do not naturally grow with a slant to the *left* on *both* hands.
The slanting key columns on keyboards were implemented so it would be easy for the mechanical levers that the keys were once mounted on to fit around each other. And this on a device whose key order was chosen *specifically* to slow down typists to prevent jamming.
Place your fingers on the home-row keys. Now try to type the letter C with the correct (middle) finger without taking your other fingers off the home-row keys. Why is it such a stretch to do so? Why is *this* the preferred layout we're trying to preserve?
Well, It's been a really long time since any keyboard I've used has had levers under it. And my fingers still haven't grown to slant to the left.
Keyboard manufacturers should have used the years since manual typewriters went out of style to slowly straighten the key columns and get us more and more adjusted to the idea of a straight lineup. Doing so overnight isn't going to work, obviously.
Splitting a keyboard in the middle and angling the key groups doesn't quite work. Each keygroup still keeps the leftward slant, even if it's easier on the left hand with the tilt. But it just emphasises the leftward slant for the *right* hand. Not to mention the fact that several popular 'ergonomic' keyboard manufacturers erroneously put the number 6 on the left side of the keyboard. Despite the fact that it is indeed easier to reach on a slanted keyboard with the left hand, touch typists are trained to reach it with the *right* hand. You move it to the other side of an inch-wide plastic no-hand's-land and touch typists are going to spend some time regularly jamming index fingers into unyielding plastic until they retrain.
Retrain? Didn't we split up the slanted keyboard to improve it without the need for retraining? If we're going to retrain, why not get rid of the slant and solve the 6 key problem by making it easier to reach with the correct hand?
Eric K. on June 6, 2005 12:03 PM> do you think that the ability to heavily control the layout of the buttons makes a big difference
I think so, yes. A "grid of buttons" doesn't offer the same usability as a button panel with a specific layout to reflect the task.
The abKey is interesting but looks like it was just made available in April. I can't find any reviews, only previews:
http://asia.cnet.com/reviews/gadgetbuzz/0,39041749,39197375,00.htm
As for the kinesis, it is a bit expensive at $300, but if it lasts for 10 years, that's a reasonable investment. The USB model should keep you going indefinitely..
Thanks for responding Jeff. That's a good point about usability.
This is the second time I've asked about input devices (I asked in the logitech mx518 thread how useful the resolution buttons were). I have an input device, well, fetish myself and while you can find some reviews of these devices, it's hard to find real comparative discussions; particularly with a software developer focus.
Eric,
I'll second your recommendation of the Kinesis contoured keyboard. There are a lot more comments about them here http://www.c2.com/cgi/wiki?KinesisKeyboard
Kinesis stoled their design from Maltron. Maltron is the original ergonomic keyboard, and I swear by it.
Jimmy on August 28, 2005 9:10 PMFound a P5 Glove development area setup
Herman Moore on June 13, 2006 8:54 AMInteresting take on the DX panel:
http://www.simhq.com/_technology2/technology_105d.html
Jeff Atwood on June 30, 2007 11:49 PMNormally, applications for beta testing in the menu items in error reporting. So I give him the benefit of doubt that this app still in the design phase;)
dik on December 11, 2007 3:52 AMDvorak is tricky yeah. Colemak is much better!
http://colemak.com/
Thanks for responding Jeff. That's a good point about usability.
youtube on March 18, 2008 10:35 AMThanks for responding Jeff. That's a good point about usability.
youtube on March 18, 2008 10:36 AMThanks for responding Jeff. That's a good point about usability.
seal cegel on April 18, 2009 1:29 AMThanks for responding Jeff. That's a good point about usability.
sealonline cegel on April 18, 2009 1:29 AMThanks for responding Jeff. That's a good point about usability.
seal online cegel on April 18, 2009 1:29 AMThanks for responding Jeff. That's a good point about usability.
cheap seal cegel on April 18, 2009 1:30 AMThanks for responding Jeff. That's a good point about usability.
buy seal online cegel on April 18, 2009 1:30 AMThanks for responding Jeff. That's a good point about usability.
tvdra on July 27, 2009 8:29 AM| Content (c) 2009 Jeff Atwood. Logo image used with permission of the author. (c) 1993 Steven C. McConnell. All Rights Reserved. |