I <3 Steve McConnell*
Coding Horror
programming and human factors
by Jeff Atwood

January 18, 2006

DIVX vs. DivX

It's ironic that the popular DivX codec has all but obliterated the identity of the ill-fated DIVX pay-per-view rental system.

DivX logo vs. DIVX logo

So what was DIVX?

DIVX (Digital Video Express) was a rental format variation on the DVD player in which a customer would buy a DIVX disc -- physically similar to a DVD -- at a low cost, which would be able to be freely viewed up to 48 hours from its initial viewing. After this period, the disc could be viewed by paying a continuation fee, typically $3.25. DIVX discs could only be played on special DIVX/DVD combo players that needed to be connected to a phone line. DIVX Viewers had to set up an account that additional viewing fees could be charged to. The player would call an account server over the phone line to charge for viewing fees similar to the way DirecTV and Dish Network satellite systems handle pay-per-view. Viewers who wanted unlimited viewing of a particular disc could pay to convert the disc to "Silver" status for a special fee. The physical disc was not altered in any way. The viewer's account kept track of the status of each disc. The Silver disc could be kept for future viewing, resold, given away, or discarded.

This particular bad idea was intensely unpopular online. In 1998 and early 1999, it felt like you couldn't visit a website without seeing an anti-DIVX banner plastered on it somewhere.

Free DVD! Fight DIVX!

The format barely lasted a year.

The DivX codec was introduced in 1998 and intentionally named to parody the besieged DIVX format:

Early versions of DivX included only a codec, and were named "DivX ;-)", where the winking emoticon was a tongue-in-cheek reference to the failed DIVX system.

The DivX codec has a rather storied history itself:

1998 3.11 Alpha Codec created from an illegally hacked MPEG-4 video codec
2001 4.0 DivX corporation formed; clean room codec "created" from OpenDivx project*
2002 5.0 Codec improvements
2005 6.0 Codec expanded to full media container format (eg, *.divx)

The name replacement is so complete that the divx domain has been subsumed as well. You can watch it change hands via the internet archive wayback machine. The last DIVX snapshot is in October 1999; the site goes dark throughout 2000, and reappears in February 2001 as DivX.

It sure is funny when a little hacked codec name joke turns into a multi-million dollar business under the same exact name.

* The ethically questionable 2001 commercial DivX fork of the OpenDivx project is where the open source XviD codec originates from. It's DivX backwards, naturally.

Posted by Jeff Atwood    View blog reactions

 

« Our Virtual Machine Future The World's Slowest Windows XP System »

 

Comments

You should also check out DivX Labs, where you can find links to the DivX codec 6.1.1 update, Dr DivX 2 OSS, DivX 6 for Mac, DivX 6 for Intel Mac beta, the beta DivX Browser Plug-in, SDKs, CES video blogs, and more good stuff :)

http://www.divxlabs.com

Al on January 18, 2006 11:49 AM

I switched to prefering xvid around the same time divx became commercial and started bundling unwanted software in the codec download. It was a pain as not all video at the time were xvid yet.

Nowadays, you can just download one of the codec packs which contains all of the neccessary codecs for your video viewing and converting needs:
<a href="http://www.codecguide.com/">http://www.codecguide.com/</a>;
<a href="http://xpcodecpack.com/">http://xpcodecpack.com/</a>;

Alan Le on January 18, 2006 01:16 PM

I've become partial to just installing ffdshow on my own machines; it seems that it covers pretty much every major format without clogging my machine up with redundant and useless stuff like a regular codec pack might.

ChrisE on January 19, 2006 12:49 PM

ffdshow is by far the best DivX/XviD/MPEG4 codec out there. It uses about 8% cpu while playing a video with postprocessing.

It's also got a great set of video processing filters (like lighting/gamma adjustment, colour adjustment, screen capture, logo erase, subtitles, smoothing, deinterlacing, movie statistics, and a whole whack more). And what's best, you can access them by an icon in the system tray that only appears when a movie is playing!

The postprocessing filters are great too. And when they get the new mplayer postprocessing filters in there (the one that uses the shmancy new SPP entropy smoothing algorithm that actually makes crusty errored videos look smooth), it'll be GAME OVER. :)

ChrisG on January 19, 2006 05:41 PM

I now encode movies and other files with Nero 7's Nero Recode 2 in the Standard MP4 format. I then use MP4CAM2AVI_v227 (google it) to convert to a divx-compatible format playable in DVD players such as the LG LDA-530. It increases the file size (ie 1120->1230) but does not affect the quality which is superior to divx or xvid. The whole process is MUCH faster than converting with divx.

This also enables the use of Nero Recode 2 which is really handy. The only drawbacks (which I'm used to now) are you have to figure out how much the file size increases if you're trying to fit to a disc size and you are limited to a 2GB file size with MP4CAM2AVI for each file which is rarely if ever a problem. (If you get this problem you can split the mp4 with YAMB, use MP4CAM2AVI to convert to avi then finally "append" the segments with Virtualdub).

I've done four movies and they were all superior to any xvid or divx I have done using AutoGK, Divx6 Create or Virtualdub. I could NOT distinguish the DVD from the final avi file. It's the Nero codec. (use the default Standard but NOT avc) Use 2-pass for best results.

The future of Divx?
WMVHD is not really competition as its based on DRM and almost in a separate category for the intended use. I'd say it's really between Nero and Divx for the compressed file market. Divx is really advertising but have an inferior codec. A nice piece of software to make the Menus (DVD Ultra) will really be the deciding factor. I suspect Divx will get its act together and come out on top. However, there's a real problem they will tweak their codec to the point that players with poor firmware support won't eventually play newer versions of the codec. (However, if streaming wireless devices come more common, many people will stream from their PC rather than buy a new device. I know I won't want to pay between $400 and $1500 for a good High-Def/DVD-Ultra/WMV9 etc device if I can spend $100 or so on a box or just buy a long cable.

Please pass on the MP4CAM2AVI info!

photonboy on January 23, 2006 01:25 PM

Thanks for your candid advice. It's hard to find simple english (non-techy or at least not too techy)commentary such as yours.

I look forward to trying your alternate conversion techniques.

Thanks.

Haze on November 30, 2006 08:10 PM







(hear it spoken)


(no HTML)




Content (c) 2008 Jeff Atwood. Logo image used with permission of the author. (c) 1993 Steven C. McConnell. All Rights Reserved.